Kesantunan berbahasa tetua adat pada acara menyambut tamu di kabupaten lampung selatan: kajian etnopragmatik

  • Evi Maha Kastri 
    Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
    Indonesia

Abstract

Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan teori kajian etnopragmatik. Sumber data penelitian diambil dari acara merabatin ‘menyambut tamu dari pihak calon pengantin laki-laki’ yang diadakan di Natar, Lampung Selatan. Data penelitian berupa rekaman suara tuturan tetua adat Lampung dialek A dan Lampung dialek O. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan cara merekam tuturan yang dikemukakan tetua adat pada acara inti. Pelaku tuturan tersebut yaitu tetua adat dari Desa Natar, Lampung Selatan dan tetua adat dari Desa Rajabasa Batanghari, Lampung Timur. Langkah konkret dalam menganalisis data adalah teknik analisis data dilakukan dengan langkah-langkah (a) mentranskripsi data rekaman suara, (b) menerjemahkan hasil transkripsi, (c) mengidentifikasi data sesuai dengan prinsip kesantunan berbahasa, (d) menginterpretasi temuan yang mengambil komponen utamanya dari tuturan, dan (e) menyimpulkan hasil analisis. Tujuan penelitian adalah mendeskripsikan (1) wujud kesantunan berbahasa yang digunakan oleh tetua adat dalam acara merabatin dan (2) wujud fenomena etnopragmatik dalam tuturan tetua adat dalam acara merabatin. Temuan penelitian adalah bahwa wujud kesantunan berbahasa pada tuturan maksim kerendahan hati 27%, maksim kedermawanan 19%, maksim pemufakatan 17%, maksim pujian 14%, maksim kebijaksanaan 13%, dan maksim kesimpatian 10%.
Keywords
  • Ethnopragmatics
  • Kesantunan berbahasa
  • Tetua adat
  • Menyambut tamu
References
  1. Alekseeva, M., Myachykov, A., Bermudez-Margaretto, B., & Shtyrov, Y. (2022). Neurophysiological correlates of automatic integration of voice and gender information during grammatical processing. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14478-2
  2. Anwar, N., Koagouw, F. V. I. ., & Kalangi, J. . (2020). Makna Pesan Eik Betbet Ritual Menyambut tamu pada masyarakat weda di kabupaten halmahera tengah. Acta Diurna Komunikasi, 2(4), 1–16.
  3. Azizmohammadi, F., & Barjesteh, H. (2019). Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication: Ethnopragmatics and Semantic Analysis. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language (IJSCL), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895811401979
  4. Beeman, W. O. (2001). Emotion and sincerity in Persian discourse: Accomplishing the representation of inner states. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 148(148), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.2001.013
  5. Chen, X. (2022). Taboo Language in Non-Professional Subtitling on Bilibili.com: A Corpus-Based Study. Languages, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020138
  6. Culpeper, J., & Tantucci, V. (2021). The Principle of (Im)politeness Reciprocity. Journal of Pragmatics, 175, 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.008
  7. Cummings, L. (2007). Pragmatik: Sebuah Perspektif Multidisipliner (A. S. Ibrahim (ed.)). Pustaka Pelajar.
  8. Hazaymeh, O. (2022). A Linguistic Study of Jordanian Popular Metonymic Expressions. 13(2), 89–97.
  9. Kádár, D. Z., & House, J. (2021a). Interaction Ritual and (Im)Politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.021
  10. Kádár, D. Z., & House, J. (2021b). Ritual frames and mimesis: Analysing military training in Chinese universities. Language and Communication, 80, 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.05.006
  11. KBBI Daring (V). (2016). Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri
  12. Larina, T. (2020). ‘Sense of Privacy’ and ‘Sense of Elbow’: English vs Russian Values and Communicative Styles. In H. Bromhead (Ed.), Meaning, Life and Culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka (pp. 421–440). ANU Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1d5nm0d.28
  13. Leech, G. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip Pragmatik. UI-Press.
  14. Liu, J. (2020). A pragmatic analysis of hedges from the perspective of politeness principle. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(12), 1614–1619. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1012.15
  15. Mahsun. (2007). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Tahapan Strategi, Netode, dan Tekniknya (3rd ed.). PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
  16. Minandar, C. A. (2019). Aktualisasi Piil Pesenggiri Sebagai Falsafah Hidup Mahasiswa Lampung Di Tanah Rantau. Sosietas, 8(2), 517–526. https://doi.org/10.17509/sosietas.v8i2.14594
  17. Minga, J., Stockbridge, M. D., Durfee, A., & Johnson, M. (2022). Clinical Guidelines for Eliciting Discourse Using the RHDBank Protocol. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31(5), 1949–1962. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-22-00097
  18. Muin, F., Noortyani, R., & Elyani, E. P. (2021). Rethinking arbitrariness of language and its implication in language use. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1868687
  19. Nugroho, A. C., & Hardilla, D. (2020). The Importance of Cultural Heritage Conservation in Society: A Review and Prospect for Future Cities, with Bandar Lampung as Cased Study. The 1st International Conference on Urban Design and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/409/1/012013
  20. Oboko, U. G. (2020). Language as a didactic tool and vehicle of cultural preservation: A pragma-sociolinguistic study of selected IGBO proverbs. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 8(2), 121–136.
  21. Parmentier, R. J. (2009). Cliff Goddard (ed.), Ethnopragmatics: Understanding Discourse in Cultural Context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2006. Pp. iv, 278. Hb $105.30. Language in Society, 38(2), 275–276. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404509090423
  22. Pradnyani, N. L. P. B., Laksana, I. K. D., & Aryawibawa, I. N. (2019). Kesantunan Berbahasa Guru dan Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia pada Kelas VII SMP Negeri 1 Kuta Utara. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 8(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v8i2.21374
  23. Suhendar, Z. (2021). Begawi Cakak Pepadun dan Status Sosial. UIN Raden Intan Lampung.
  24. Suwatno, E. (2016). Metafora Sinestesia dalam Bahasa Jawa. Jalabahasa, 12(2), 101–109.
  25. Tantucci, V., Wang, A., & Culpeper, J. (2022). Reciprocity and epistemicity: On the (proto)social and cross-cultural ‘value’ of information transmission. Journal of Pragmatics, 194, 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.04.012
  26. Terkourafi, M. (2021). Pragmatics as an interdisciplinary field. Journal of Pragmatics, 179, 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.015
  27. Tettamanti, M., Vaghi, M. M., Bara, B. G., Cappa, S. F., Enrici, I., & Adenzato, M. (2017). Effective connectivity gateways to the Theory of Mind network in processing communicative intention. NeuroImage, 155(March), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.050
  28. Titscher, S., Mayer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2009). Metode Analisis Teks dan Wacana (A. S. Ibrahim (Ed.); 1st ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
  29. Ulrikayanti, G. F. (2022). Javanese Politeness Principles in Tilik Short Movie. 50(1), 50–61.
  30. Yanti, N., & Hiasa, F. (2021). Implementasi Kesantunan Berbahasa Pedagang Ikan di Kawasan Pesisir Kota Bengkulu. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 10(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.26499/rnh.v10i1.983
  31. Yaqubi, M. (2020). Subtitling of ostensible speech acts (OSAs). Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.18033.yaq
  32. Yaqubi, M. (2021). Revisited interpretation of Ta’ārof: Towards a model of analysing meta-implicatures of Persian offers in Iranian films. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 34(2), 712–738. https://am.e-nformation.ro/scholarly-journals/revisited-interpretation-em-ta-ārof-towards-model/docview/2635471205/se-2?accountid=136549%0Ahttps://media.proquest.com/media/hms/PFT/1/y0VFM?_a=ChgyMDIyMDcwMjE0MjExMTgxNDo1OTc1ODUSBzEwMjY2NjUaCk9ORV9TRUFSQ0gi
  33. Yasakova, N. Y., Kharchenko, S. V., & Shynkaruk, V. D. (2019). Verbal Indicators of Linguistic and Cultural Identity (Personal Pronouns as The Example). Cogito - Multidisciplinary Research Journal, XI, no.4, 201–215. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
  34. Yustanto, H. (2021). Effects of Prosody on The Politeness of Javanese Interrogative Sentences. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics …, 12(13), 634–641. https://www.turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/8409
  35. Zawarnis, Y., Kastri, E. M., Nasution, H., & Saputri, A. (2020). Kamus Lampung--Indonesia (J. H. Matanggui & B. Erwina (Eds.); 2nd ed.). Kantor Bahasa Provinsi Lampung. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.kantorbahasalampung.kamus

Downloads

PDF

Statistic

Abstract Views
: 375 times
PDF
: 38 times