Enhancing students’ participation through question and answer on SMAN 2 Sungai Kakap Kubu Raya

Abstract

The aim of this research is to enhance students’ participation by using question and answer technique. Therefore, the question of the research is how does Question and Answer enhance students’ participation on the 11th grade students of SMAN 2 Sungai KakapKubu Raya in academic year 2021/2022?”. The research was conducted in classroom action research design. The research was conducted in two cycles.  On the first cycle, there were only some students who actively participated in the learning activity. On the second cycle, most of the students were very active. The problem about lack of participation was solved. Therefore, it is concluded that question and answer technique is useful in improving students’ participation.
Keywords
  • CAR
  • Student’s participation
  • Question and Answer
References
  1. Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: Genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561–598. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140
  2. Caraceni, P., Riggio, O., Angeli, P., Alessandria, C., Neri, S., Foschi, F. G., Levantesi, F., Airoldi, A., Boccia, S., & Svegliati-Baroni, G. (2018). Long-term albumin administration in decompensated cirrhosis (ANSWER): an open-label randomised trial. The Lancet, 391(10138), 2417–2429. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30840-7
  3. Chen, H., Su, Y., Zheng, Q., & Li, L. (2019). Towards an operationalized and effective school self-evaluation system: An ongoing action research study in Chinese secondary schools since 2011. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60, 117–129.
  4. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
  5. Dhari, P. W., Anggraini, H., & Nasution, M. K. (2022). Peran Guru Kelas dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berbahasa Siswa Kelas Rendah. Ta’dib, 12(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54604/tdb.v12i1.121
  6. Feng, H.-Y., Fan, J.-J., & Yang, H.-Z. (2013). The relationship of learning motivation and achievement in EFL: Gender as an intermediated variable. Educational Research International, 2(2), 50–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9625-z
  7. Ing, M., Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Turrou, A. C., Wong, J., Shin, N., & Fernandez, C. H. (2015). Student participation in elementary mathematics classrooms: the missing link between teacher practices and student achievement? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 90, 341–356.
  8. Larrain, A., Freire, P., López, P., & Grau, V. (2019). Counter-arguing during curriculum-supported peer interaction facilitates middle-school students’ science content knowledge. Cognition and Instruction, 37(4), 453–482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2019.1627360
  9. Leong, L. M., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2017). An analysis of factors influencing learners’ English speaking skill. https://www.sid.ir/paper/349619/en
  10. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2021). How Languages Are Learned 5th Edition. Oxford university press.
  11. Manik, I. K. (2020). Efektivitas metode tanya jawab multi arah untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar IPS. Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 8(1), 133–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v8i1.24598
  12. McIntosh, C., Patterson, J., & Miller, S. (2018). First year midwifery students’ experience with self-recorded and assessed video of selected midwifery practice skills at Otago Polytechnic in New Zealand. Nurse Education in Practice, 28, 54–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.09.016
  13. Muhonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A.-M., Lerkkanen, M.-K., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2018). Quality of educational dialogue and association with students’ academic performance. Learning and Instruction, 55, 67–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.09.007
  14. Naibaho, L. (2019). The Integration Of Group Discussion Method Using Audio Visual Learning Media Toward Students’learning Achievement On Listening. International Journal of Research-GRANTHAALAYAH, 7(8), 438–445. http://repository.uki.ac.id/id/eprint/1506
  15. O’Connor, C., Michaels, S., & Chapin, S. (2015). Scaling down” to explore the role of talk in learning: From district intervention to controlled classroom study. Socializing Intelligence through Academic Talk and Dialogue, 111–126.
  16. Phillippi, J., & Lauderdale, J. (2018). A guide to field notes for qualitative research: Context and conversation. Qualitative Health Research, 28(3), 381–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317697102
  17. Roza, M. (2022). Analisis Pemahaman Guru Pai Dalam Menyusun Penilaian Menggunakan Teknik Multiple Choice Pada Tingkat SMP Di Pekanbaru. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 13(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/jep.v13i1.26058
  18. Sedova, K., Sedlacek, M., Svaricek, R., Majcik, M., Navratilova, J., Drexlerova, A., Kychler, J., & Salamounova, Z. (2019). Do those who talk more learn more? The relationship between student classroom talk and student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 63, 101217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101217
  19. Setyanto, N. A. (2017). Interaksi dan komunikasi efektif belajar-mengajar. DIVA PRESS.
  20. Tarihoran, N., Syafuri, S., & Rahmania Elbarusi, A. (2020). The role of positive psychology in English foreign language classroom. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/acpch-19/125932583
  21. Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C. (2014). Engaging with others’ mathematical ideas: Interrelationships among student participation, teachers’ instructional practices, and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 63, 79–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001